Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Launches Toolkit to Help Teachers and Other Public Servants Tackle Student Debt

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
August 28, 2013

CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU LAUNCHES TOOLKIT TO HELP TEACHERS AND OTHER PUBLIC SERVANTS TACKLE STUDENT DEBT
One in Four American Workers May Be Eligible For Student Debt Forgiveness

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) launched a toolkit to empower school districts and other public service organizations to help their employees pay off student loan debt. The CFPB is asking these employers to make a pledge to inform their employees of their options. Up to a quarter of the U.S. workforce is in public service and may be eligible for existing student loan debt forgiveness programs, according to a CFPB report also released today.

“Our young people should not be mired in debt because they stir themselves to the call of public service. They deserve to know all their options,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “Our toolkit and pledge can be a win-win for employers, the public they serve, and their employees who are facing student debt loads that are imposing unprecedented burdens upon this generation.”

According to a report released today, the CFPB estimates that more than 25 percent of the U.S. labor force is in public service. This includes teachers, librarians, firefighters, military personnel, law enforcement, first responders, nurses, and social workers. There are a number of special loan programs to assist these workers. For example, in 2007, Congress created the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program for public servants who pay their federal loans on time for ten years. People working at a nonprofit or those working for a federal, state, or local government are eligible for the program.

Read more…

Judge Riblet on the Absolute Priority Rule, Again

The last time we checked, Judge Riblet in Santa Barbara was firmly on the fence regarding the Absolute Priority Rule (see post here).  Since then, I have had a disclosure statement hearing where she made her views very clear.

First of all, she says that she believes that the Friedman case (466 B.R. 471) is dispositive for her: she must follow it.  The case comes from the 9th Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, not the 9th Circuit itself, and there is some uncertainty whether a bankruptcy judge must follow BAP precedent the same way that she would follow the circuit court.  Judge Riblet admits no uncertainty here: she follows the BAP.

However, that doesn’t mean she likes it.  She urged my opponent to appeal her order if and when she confirms my client’s plan, because she said she wants to see Friedman overturned and have the Absolute Priority Rule apply to individual debtors as well as business debtors.

The objecting creditor has stated that he has authority to appeal this question to the Supreme Court.  Any debtors’ attorneys out there that want to help me out on this?

Relocation of CM/ECF Email Delivery Servers

To All ECF Users:

The Court was recently notified that in August, the Administrative Office of the U. S. Courts moved the location of its CM/ECF email delivery servers to provide for better backup and recovery.  As a result of the migration, several new Mail server Internet Protocol (IP) addresses were assigned to the CM/ECF email delivery application.

Because the migration involved a network location move, we have been monitoring the bounce-back of NEF deliveries to ensure that the Internet Service Providers for our registered CM/ECF users are not blocking NEF deliveries from these new IP addresses.

We are unsure of the impact of this change but believe the majority of court users will be unaffected.  However, if you believe that you are not receiving NEFs, you should contact the ECF Help Support Desk immediately at (213) 894-2365.  Because the migration involved a network location move, if you are not receiving notices, you may need to contact your Internet Service Provider to have the new uscourts.gov Mail server IP addresses shown below whitelisted.

— 63.241.40.200
— 63.241.40.202
— 63.241.40.204
— 63.241.40.205
— 199.107.16.200
— 199.107.16.202
— 199.107.16.204
— 199.107.16.205
— 206.18.112.200
— 206.18.112.202
— 206.18.112.204
— 206.18.112.205

We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused you.  Please call the help desk at (213) 894-2365 if you have any questions.

Chapter 13 Motions Seminar in Santa Ana

Orange County Chapter 13 Motions: What you need to know! The five most important Chapter 13 motions.

September 14, 2013 Orange County — 9:30 a.m. to 12 noon — Orange County Law Library

$129 per person if paid online before September 7, 2013 — $159 paid after September 7, 2013 — two units of MCLE provided

Attorney Mike Gouveia and a special guest OC speaker will show you in samples and materials from five motions that will help your chapter 13 practice grow:

Motion to Modify/Suspend

3015-1.05.MOTION.MODIFY.SUSPEND

Motion to Refinance 3015-1.15

Motion to Incur New Debt 3015-1.17

Objection to Proof of Claim

F3007-1.1.NOTICE.OBJ.CLAIM

Motion to Sell 3015-1.16

-Mike Gouveia

Email mgo29@att.net if you have any questions.

Earle Hagen Memorial Golf & Tennis Tournament

I hope you will join us for the 2013 Earle Hagen Memorial Golf & Tennis Tournament taking place on Monday, September 30, 2013 at Porter Valley Country Club!

Proceeds from the Earle Hagen Memorial Golf & Tennis Tournament will go towards the support of Public Counsel’s Debtor Assistance Project (“DAP”).

For over a decade, Public Counsel’s DAP has helped thousands of individuals to navigate the bankruptcy system when they are no longer able to support their families while struggling under crushing debt loads, as well as assist innocent victims of fraud. Individuals like Ajamu Azibo, who was the unfortunate victim of both identity theft and “bankruptcy hijacking.” Mr. Azibo visited the Los Angeles Bankruptcy Self-Help Desk for assistance to find out how a bankruptcy could be fraudulently filed in his name without his knowledge, and what he could do to fix the situation. He was confused, and also concerned about what effect the filing might have on his job. Fortunately, Public Counsel was there to help. Public Counsel successfully represented him in an expungement motion, and his case was featured on public radio station 89.3, KPCC-FM. KPCC reporter Ruxandra Guidi interviewed Mr. Azibo, and his story aired on KPCC. Attached hereto is a Press Clip of Mr. Azibo’s story. However, Mr. Azibo is only one example of a client Public Counsel’s DAP is able to assist due to your continued support.

Public Counsel’s DAP provides greatly needed pro bono legal services to over 4,000 individuals and families every year by:

-providing counsel and advise at the Los Angeles Self Help Desk;
-guiding pro se litigants in the Chapter 7 bankruptcy process at monthly Chapter 7 clinics;
-advising pro se litigants regarding their rights at monthly reaffirmation hearings in the Los Angeles and Woodland Hills divisions;
-representing consumer debtors in Chapter 7 pro bono cases; and
-defending consumers against non-meritorious non-dischargeability complaints.

Your participation at the Tournament is one way you can support our work and help make a difference in the lives of individuals of those most vulnerable in our community.  I would greatly appreciate your assistance in forwarding this information to friends and colleagues interested in being a part of this great event. Also, if you would like to be a Tee sponsor, please contact Jim King at (818) 242-1100 or via email at king@kingobk.com.

Request for Volunteers from the Bar

ATTENTION MEMBERS OF THE BAR:

The Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California is seeking members of the Bar who represent debtors to assist with the testing of a pilot program called Debtor Electronic Bankruptcy Noticing or DBEN. DEBN will allow debtors to elect to receive entered orders and court-generated notices by email instead of their street address. Debtors will only receive the orders and court generated notices by email that they otherwise would have received by U.S. Mail. The pilot program is a collaboration with the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts (AO) and the Bankruptcy Noticing Center (BNC). Testing is expected to begin in Fall, 2013, and last approximately 60 days. The deadline to volunteer is Thursday, August 16, 2013. Please see attached document for more information.

Regards,

ECF Help Desk
(213) 894-2365

Detroit bankruptcy brings business to multiple law firms

By Martha Neil

From http://www.abajournal.com

Although Detroit is short of money to run the city, its Chapter 9 bankruptcy filing is expected to ring up business for multiple law firms.

Jones Day is representing the city, and bondholders, creditors, insurers, pension funds and retirees are expected to lawyer up, too, as big-bucks issues, such as responsibility for repaying some $8 billion in bond debt owed by Detroit, as well as another $5.7 billion in unfunded health care and retirement benefits to former workers, are negotiated, Reuters reports.

Opportunities for lucrative legal work abound. The Detroit Institute of Arts, for instance, retained partner Richard Levin of Cravath Swaine & Moore to represent its museum in a dispute over the city’s power, or lack thereof, to sell the museum’s art collection.

And Arent Fox, Kirkland & Ellis, Sidley Austin, Weil Gotshal & Manges and Winston & Strawn are also among the law firms either already hired or thought to be in the pipeline to represent entities caught up in the municipal maelstrom.

Already at issue is whether the state governor had the power to file for bankruptcy, under the Michigan state constitution, when doing so puts protected retirement benefits for public workers at risk. A state-court judge last week ordered the city’s emergency manager to withdraw the bankruptcy petition he filed on Thursday; however, the state attorney general has filed an appeal of that order, recounts another Reuters article.

Observers say they expect the bankruptcy judge to put the state-court case on pause, so that the city’s eligibility to file for bankruptcy can be dealt with in federal court. Also likely to be contested is whether Detroit made sufficient efforts to negotiate with creditors before filing.

Bankruptcy e-Bulletin

July 25, 2013

Dear constituency list members of the Insolvency Law Committee, the following is a legislative update that may be of interest to insolvency professionals:

SUMMARY

On July 11, 2013 Governor Brown signed into law SB 426 which expands the anti-deficiency language in Code of Civil Procedure (“C.C.P.”) sections 580b and 580d by expressly prohibiting not only: (i) a deficiency judgment against the borrower in connection with either a “purchase money” deed of trust covered under C.C.P. §580b or following a non-judicial foreclosure of a deed of trust covered under C.C.P. §580d, but now also (ii) any liability for any deficiency in the foregoing situations.   However, SB 426 expressly recognizes the right of a lender to collect any such deficiency from any additional collateral held or from any third-party guarantor.

As discussed herein, the new statute could be viewed as “clarifying” rather than “amending” existing California law so that when it becomes effective, it will apply to deficiency obligations then existing and held by any lender or its assignee.

A.           New Legislation (C.C.P. §§580b and 580d)

Prior to the enactment of SB 426, C.C.P. § 580b prohibited a deficiency judgment in connection with the following: (1) any sale of real property for failure of the purchaser to complete the contract of sale;(2) under a deed of trust given to the vendor to secure repayment of the purchase price of the encumbered property; (3) under a deed of trust on residential property given to a lender to secure repayment of a loan (“purchase money loan”) used in whole or in part to pay for the purchase price of a residence to be occupied, in whole or in part, by the purchaser; or (4) a loan used to refinance a purchase money loan except to the extent that the lender advanced new principal to the borrower which was not used to repay existing principal or interest or loan fees and costs.

Read more…

Parking at L.A. 341(a) Meetings

Here are the updated parking rates for patrons of the FIGat7th (next to Ernst & Young Building) in Downtown L.A. You or your clients can go to any of the shops or restaurants at FIGat7th after a 341(a) hearing and get validation with purchase. For example, you can buy a pack of gum at Target and get validation.

There are 500 parking spaces conveniently located at the 945 8th Street parking structure adjacent to the FIGat7th  Retail Center. Entrances to the parking structure are located on both 7th and 8th Streets. The parking structure is open 24/7.

VERY IMPORTANT: In order to receive discounted parking rates, you must have parking tickets validated in the store/restaurant, and only park on garage levels 1, 2, and 3. They take a picture of your car when you park, and are somehow able to know which one is yours when you insert your ticket to pay. Extremely creepy and very Big Brother. If you don’t park on levels 1, 2, or 3, they will know, and they will charge the maximum daily rate.

Validated rates are:
* 1st hour  $1.00
* 2nd hour  $2.50
* 3rd hour  $4.00

Website: http://www.figat7th.com/plan-your-visit/

California Governor Brown Signs Bill To Strengthen Oversight of Debt Buyers Bill Will Help Protect Consumers From Unfair Debt Collection Practices

CONSUMERS UNION NEWS RELEASE

For Immediate Release: Thursday, July 11, 2013

California Governor Brown Signs Bill To Strengthen Oversight of Debt Buyers Bill Will Help Protect Consumers From Unfair Debt Collection Practices

SACRAMENTO, CA – Governor Jerry Brown signed legislation today that will strengthen state oversight of the debt buying industry and protect consumers from unfair debt collection practices. SB 233, authored by Senator Mark Leno, requires debt buyers to provide consumers and the courts with documentation to prove that a debt is actually owed.

“There’s been an explosion of shady debt collection tactics in recent years that have triggered a record number of complaints from consumers,” said Suzanne Martindale, staff attorney for Consumers, the policy and advocacy arm of Consumer Reports. “Too many consumers are harassed for debts that they have already paid off or that don’t even belong to them. This new law will help protect consumers by making debt buyers prove they have a legitimate claim when they try to collect past debt.”

Tens of thousands of Californians are contacted every year by debt buyers they have never done business with, for debts that may be old or in an amount that doesn’t match the consumer’s memory or records. The debt may even be owed by someone else or the result of identity theft. Consumers Union’s 2011 report issued with the East Bay Community Law Center detailed how debt buyers are filing an increasing number of lawsuits against consumers even though often they don’t have proof to back up their claims.

Read more…