Consumer Financial Protection Bureau — Now you have better options to dispute a credit report erro

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

Feb 27 2014 — Now you have better options to dispute a credit report error — By Gail Hillebrand

If you’re trying to correct an error in your credit report at one of the nation’s largest credit reporting companies, there is some good news. Recently, Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion added a function to their dispute-handling system that makes it easier for you to explain your dispute. Now you can upload, mail, or fax any supporting documents you have to explain the errors in your credit report.

Why you should care about correcting your credit report — Credit reports play a part in most major consumer lending decisions– including mortgage loans, auto loans, credit cards, and private student loans. If there is inaccurate information in your report, it could cause a lender to offer you an interest rate that is less favorable than it would otherwise offer. Some inaccuracies could even lead lenders to turn you down entirely. Every year, millions of Americans exercise their right to dispute their credit report. In 2011, for example, Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion collectively received about 8 million requests disputing the accuracy of information in credit reports. Since October 2012, when we started taking credit reporting complaints, we’ve handled about 31,000 complaints from consumers frustrated with credit reporting companies. The majority of those complaints have been about the accuracy and completeness of credit reports.

What’s different? —  Now, you can provide supporting documents such as a paid bill, a letter you wrote explaining the issue, a police report, or proof of identity information, or other correspondence. Including relevant supporting documents can be important because it allows you to provide evidence that supports your dispute.
Credit reporting companies must forward your dispute, including all relevant information, to the furnisher (the company that originally gave the information to the credit reporting companies). If the furnisher corrects your information because of your dispute, it must correct that information with every credit reporting company with whom it has a relationship.

Check your credit report — So, if you haven’t done so recently, get your free annual credit report at annualcreditreport.com. Check for errors. And if you find an error, use your own words and supporting documentation to explain your dispute.

San Fernando Valley Bar Association Bankruptcy Section — MCLE Program, “ Making a deal with the trustee.”

Tuesday, February 25, 2014 at 12 noon, the San Fernando Valley Bar Association Bankruptcy Section will be having an MCLE Program titled “ Making a deal with the trustee.” You can register for the program atwww.sfvba.org or by calling (818) 227-0490 ext. 105. The speakers will include Wes Avery, a panel trustee and bankruptcy attorney, Stella Havkin, an attorney who also represents trustees and Michael Kogan, an attorney who represents trustees and for many years a panel trustee.

Attached hereto is a copy of the flyer with additional information about the program.

Third Annual LCL 5k Benefiting Public Counsel Debtor Assistance Project

 

I hope you can make it to the Third Annual LCL 5k Benefiting Public Counsel Debtor Assistance Project (“DAP”) and Samohi Cross Country/Track program, happening on April 26 at 8 am!

The race starts and ends at the same place as last year: Reed Emerson Park at the corner of 7th and California in Santa Monica.  This is the only 5k in north Santa Monica on a beautiful course along Ocean Ave. and San Vicente.

Discount for past participants: Past participants use code LCLLOYAL10 to get 10% off your registration through February 15.

When you register, you have the option of choosing individual or team registration. Either way, you are eligible for an individual AG medal if you place top 3 in your division. Register with a team to also qualify for the Fastest Team award. You can join an existing team or create a new team. Get pumped at the start and celebrate your finish with music from our DJ, and post-race snacks for all participants, including some surprises! Medals will be given to the top 3 finishers in each age group. Prizes will be awarded to top overall male, top overall female, overall fastest team, and fundraising champions. We will also have tech race shirts for all advance registrants, Bonk Breaker Bars and snacks at the finish! Enjoy a very special morning while benefiting Public Counsel’s Debtor Assistance Project and the Samohi sports program.

To register or make a donation, copy and paste this link into your browser: http://www.imathlete.com/events/LeslieCohenLaw5k/Register

March 6, 2014 – Meet the New Bankruptcy Judges

The SBCBA Debtor/Creditor Section Presents:

“Meet the New Bankruptcy Judges”

When: Thursday, March 6, 2014, from 12:00 to 1:15 pm

Where:
Location to be announced (will be in Santa Barbara or Goleta)

1 hour MCLE credit (pending approval)

Speaker(s):
Honorable Peter Carroll and Honorable Deborah Saltzman

About the Event:
As many of you know, the Honorable Robin Riblet will be retiring this year after over twenty years on the bench, and Chief Judge Peter Carroll and Judge Deborah Saltzman will soon be taking the reins in the Northern Division. The judges have graciously agreed to discuss the transition and the coming procedural changes. Please join the Santa Barbara County Bar Association for a lunch time MCLE to hear what is in store for the future.

Questions:
Due to the interest in this event the judges will be collecting questions in advance and will address selected questions during the presentation. Please email your questions to Casey Nelson at: cnelson@lafsbc.org with the subject line “Question for the Judges.”

Price:
$25.00 for SBCBA Members, $30.00 for Non-Members

Contact Information/R.S.V.P.:
Carissa Horowitz, Esq. Carissa can be contacted at carissa@beallandburkhardt.com.
Checks should be made payable to the Santa Barbara County Bar Association.
Checks should be mailed to Beal & Burkhardt, Attn: Carissa Horowitz, 317 E. Carrillo Street, Santa Barbara, CA 93101.

Please RSVP BY Monday February 24, 2014.

February 13, 2014 – Recent Changes to LBR and Court Manual and Upcoming Revisions to Relief from Stay Forms

You are invited to attend a Brown Bag Discussion

Topics: Recent Changes to LBR and Court Manual and
Upcoming Revisions to Relief from Stay Forms

Host: Honorable Vincent P. Zurzolo, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

When: Thursday, February 13, 2014 at 12:15 PM

Where: Roybal Federal Building
255 E. Temple Street, Room 1268
Los Angeles, CA 90012

Was Pacer shutdown due to a cyberattack? Group claims responsibility

By Debra Cassens Weiss  from: http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/was_pacer_shutdown_on_friday_due_to_a_cyberattack_group_claims_responsibili?utm_source=maestro&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=tech_monthly

Why did Pacer and several federal court websites shut down temporarily on Friday?

A group called European Cyber Army claimed responsibility in a tweet while media reports gave differing reasons for the shutdown, report the Washington Post blog the Switch and ZDNet.

“Government of #USA!” the Twitter message read. “We have taken the liberty of #Nuking your website http://USCourts.gov ! We are the #ECA #EuropeanCyberArmy.”

Politico had an early report on the issue. A spokesman for the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts told the publication the problem was due to a denial of service attack, which is caused when a website is inundated with traffic in an effort to shut it down. Politico also obtained a court clerk’s email message that said the problem appeared to be a “national cyberattack on the judiciary.”

Then an FBI spokesperson told Wall Street Journal (sub. req.) late Friday that the problem appeared to be caused by technical issues in federal court computers rather than a cyberattack.

On Saturday, however, the FBI said it was reassessing that analysis. Meanwhile, the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts was sticking to its assessment that the outage was the result of a malicious attack.

Charles Hall, a spokesman for the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, told the Washington Times that court officials had no comment on any groups claiming responsibility on social media. The attack began at 3:22 p.m., he said. Pacer appeared to be working again at about 7 p.m., the article said.

Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. Arkison (In re Bellingham Insurance Agency, Inc.)

Dear constituency list members of the Insolvency Law Committee:

Many of you have likely been following the Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. Arkison (In re Bellingham Insurance Agency, Inc.) case (see Insolvency Law e-Bulletin published on January 3, 2014 for an in-depth summary of the case).  The United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case this week, onJanuary 14, 2014.

For those interested, the transcript of oral argument has been posted on scotusblog.com and can be read by clicking here: http://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/12-1200_f29g.pdf.

Thank you for your continued support of the Committee.

Best regards,

Insolvency Law Committee

***Jon Hayes and Matt Resnik of SIMON RESNIK HAYES LLP attended oral argument at the Supreme Court last week and will be posting interesting tidbits shortly. 

Information re Los Angeles and San Fernando Valley divisions of the Office of the U.S. Trustee

The mailing address for the Los Angeles and San Fernando Valley divisions of the Office of the U.S. Trustee  is now as follows:

Office of the U.S. Trustee
Los Angeles and San Fernando Valley Divisions
915 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1850
Los Angeles, California 90017

IDI and 341a for SFV will STILL take place at (until further notice):

1051 Warner Center Lane
Room 105
Woodland Hills, CA 91367

IDI and 341a for LA will take place at:

Office of the United States Trustee
915 Wilshire Blvd.
10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017

Law Firm Sanctioned $5,000 for Filing Baseless Credit Card Complaint in Santa Ana

Judge Scott Clarkson has sanctioned the firm of Weinstein, Pinson & Riley $5,000 for filing a non-dischargeability complaint for a credit card company.  The firm did minimal if any investigation before filing the complaint.  A great article on the case can be found here.

FANNIE MAE — Allowable Bankruptcy Attorney Fees Exhibit

The attached table contains the maximum attorney’s fees that Fannie Mae allows for legal work related to bankruptcy  services provided on Fannie Mae whole mortgage loans and MBS mortgage loans serviced under special servicing  options. The fee will vary depending on the Chapter under which the bankruptcy is filed (and, if applicable, the status of  the mortgage loan at the time of the bankruptcy filing).