Judge Clarkson to Mediate San Bernardino Firefighters Union Dispute

BLOOMBERG
Nov. 21, 2012

San Bernardino Agrees to Mediation With Firefighters

By Steven Church

San Bernardino, the bankrupt California city, and its firefighters union agreed to seek court-supervised mediation of their labor contract disputes, the city said in court papers.

The two sides will ask U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Scott Clarkson to oversee talks aimed at resolving their disagreements, which were not specified in the court filing today in Riverside, California.

Two weeks after the city filed for bankruptcy protection on Aug. 1, the union threatened to try to have the case dismissed.

San Bernardino was the third California city to file bankruptcy in less than three months. The city of about 209,000 people lies about 60 miles (97 kilometers) east of Los Angeles. A fiscal emergency, brought on by a $46 million budget shortfall, forced it to stop paying some creditors and seek court protection, the city said.

The case is In re San Bernardino, 12-28006, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Central District of California (Riverside).

To contact the reporter on this story: Steven Church in Wilmington, Delaware at schurch3@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: John Pickering at jpickering@bloomberg.net

Los Angeles Federal Bar Association — 9th Annual Bankruptcy Ethics Symposium

Friday, December 14, 2012; Registration: 8:30 a.m.; Program: 9:00 a.m. – 12:45 p.m.

United States Trustee 341(a) Meeting Room; 725 South Figueroa St., Los Angeles

Topics:
Inducing Attorney Conduct
Marketing a Bankruptcy Practice (Effectively and Ethically): The Lawyer, Her Technology, and Techno-Ethical Issues
An Ethics Conversation with Judge Russell
Special Afternoon Program: Substance Abuse MCLE (1 hr.) and Elimination of Bias MCLE (1 hr.)

Speakers:
Hon. Barry Russell, United States Bankruptcy Court
Hon. Catherine E. Bauer, United States Bankruptcy Court
J. Scott Bovitz, Esq., Bovitz & Spitzer
Christie L. Cronenweth, Esq., Law Offices of Christie Cronenweth
Jay S. Fleischman, Esq
Jeffrey I. Golden, Esq., Weiland, Golden, LLP
M. Jonathan Hayes, Esq., Law Offices of M. Jonathan Hayes
Natella Royzman, Esq., Royzman Law Firm
Jill M. Sturtevant, Assistant United States Trustee

Lawyer Bio is the Most Important Part of Your Website

According to this fascinating Lexis-Nexis article, 38 percent of law firm marketing expenditures are spent on online efforts.  It says, “When asked about the most popular content on their website, lawyer biographies are the most visited pages (85% of respondents), followed by information about practice area/sector expertise (52%) and thought leadership articles, case histories, etc. (50%).”

Download the full report of “The Use of Websites in Law Firm Marketing: Examining how corporate law firms use their websites in marketing and business development” here.

July Bar Exam Results Are In

SAN FRANCISCO, Nov. 16, 2012, 6 p.m. – The State Bar of California’s Committee of Bar Examiners reported today that 55.3 percent of the applicants passed the July 2012 General Bar Examination (GBX).  If the 4,834 people who passed the July 2012 exam satisfy other requirements for admission, they will become members of the State Bar.

Preliminary statistical analyses show that of the 8,737 applicants who took the GBX, 74.2 percent were first-time takers. The passing rate for 6,485 first-time applicants was 68 percent overall. The passing rate for the 2,252 applicants repeating the examination was 18 percent overall.

What jumped out at me is this fact:

Out of the total taking the Attorneys’ Examination, 25 were disciplined lawyers who took the examination as a condition of reinstatement; one (1) disciplined lawyer passed.

Read all about it here.

Judge Scott Clarkson – Photographer

I don’t remember if I’ve mentioned to you that Judge Scott Clarkson is a pretty talented guy.  Between packed hearing days, a busy voluntary mediation schedule, and overseing the Central District’s newly filed mega-case American Suzuki Motor Company, he has continued his remarkable “other career” as a documentary photographer.  On the occasion of the October 22, 2012 passing of former U.S. Senator George McGovern, the 1972 candidate for the Presidency, and one of my personal heroes, the national and international media scrambled for current photographs of McGovern.  That’s when Judge Clarkson’s work stepped in.

It turns out that during McGovern’s 2009 book tour of his “Lincoln” biography, Judge Clarkson, then in private law practice, was invited by the Richard M. Nixon Library & Museum inYorba Linda to document the McGovern lecture that took place in the Museum’s packed replica of the White House East Room.  While Judge Clarkson had posted some of the photographs on his web page, not much else came from the photo-shoot at that time.  But upon McGovern’s passing, the flurry of efforts to find more modern era photos of McGovern lead, of course, to Judge Clarkson.  Releases and credits provided, various McGovern photos by Judge Clarkson have populated hundreds of international web sites over the last three weeks.

Some of his photos of McGovern appear here: Read more…

U.S. Trustee’s Office (Riverside) Brown Bag Program

Save the date! Monday, December 3, 2012 at noon.

No cost program: Fundamentals of the Chapter 7 Means Test.

New Riverside UST offices: 3801 University Ave., Suite 100, Riverside, CA 92501.

Flyer attached. 

Program in Woodland Hills

Dear All:

I invite each of you to attend the San Fernando Valley Bar Association Bankruptcy Section’s November 28th panel program reviewing bankruptcy opinions during the past year from the Ninth Circuit.  The panelists are experienced bankruptcy attorneys Jim Felton and Richard Gibson.  Typically this program brings in many attorneys who also speak with some personal knowledge about the cases being reviewed and they offer additional color.   There will be a lot of comments and feedback during the program.  No promises but I will try to get a Woodland Hills to attend the program.

Here are the particulars:

9th Circuit Bankruptcy Year in Review

Read more…

Relevance of Amending Tax Returns to Dischargeability of Taxes; John Fauchet to the Rescue Again

Question:

My PC filed his timely 2007 tax returns.  Seven months ago, the returns were amended reducing the tax owed.  Does the amendment restart the three year statute of limitations for dischargeability?

Stella Havkin

Stella, The three year statute runs from the date the return was first due.  Filing a late return, no matter how late, cannot change the date the return was first due.   Maybe John can comment, but when I’m working a tax case with  tax attorneys, they will file late, late, late amended returns if they believe the first return was wrong and overstated the liability.  The IRS can say, sorry, too late, but in appeals, it is my understanding, the IRS can actually consider them.  John?

Dennis McGoldrick

Stella and Dennis, I’m unaware of any statute that prevents a taxpayer from amending an already-filed tax return at any time.  See, for instance, this section of the IRM, which posits an amended return filed six years late:

The complications usually arise from the date of payment.  You can’t amend a tax return that’s already five years old and get back your original withholdings.  But you can file that return and affect the amount you owed on that return; if your five-year-old return says you owed $20,000, you never paid it, and you amend to show that you actually owe $10, your assessment will change and you’ll owe $10 – assuming the IRS doesn’t use that as the opportunity to audit you and find out that you really owed the $20,000 all along.

In Stella’s case below: the amended return shows an amount owed.  That’s what he owes; the date of assessment is the date that the IRS receives his amended return.  Count 240 days from that date, and it’s dischargeable under that rule.  But that’s not the only dischargeability rule.

The amended return doesn’t change the three-year statute all over again; the return was originally due on either 4/15/2008 or 10/15/2008, dates long since past.

But this amended return does implicate the two-year rule at 523(a)(1)(B)(ii).  You’ll have to wait another 17 months to discharge the tax showing on it, even though it decreases the assessment.

John D. Faucher

New President of Consumer Bankruptcy Organization

  Last Thursday night, I was sworn in as the 2013 President of the Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys Association.  Looking forward to a great year. Vice President is Nancy Clark.  Treasurer is Tom Ure and Secretary is David Jacobs.  We are roughly 270 members strong.

Nice Analysis of Non-Dischargeability Judgment Liens from David Lally

Hello. This concerns a dischargeabilty judgment.  First, it is a federal judgment, and second, a dischargeability judgment.  So, there are several issues that arise.

1.    Under 9th Circuit law, if a debt is not discharged, it is never discharged.  In re Moncur (9th Cir. BAP 2005)  Pursuant to the doctrines of claim and issue preclusion, a debt which is excepted from discharge in a Chapter 7 case does not become dischargeable in a second Chapter 7 case if the creditor fails to file a second dischargeability action.  Once not discharged, forever not discharged.  Citing In re Paine 283 B.R. 33 (9th Cir. BAP 2002).   So, the personal liability under the judgment is never discharged so it cannot expire.

Next, there is a Federal Statute, 28 USC Section 3201 “Judgment Liens,” which says the judgment is good for 20 years.  See below:   (c) Duration of Lien; Renewal.— (1)Except as provided in paragraph (2), a lien created under subsection (a) is effective, unless satisfied, for a period of 20 years. (2) Such lien may be renewed for one additional period of 20 years upon filing a notice of renewal in the same manner as the judgment is filed and shall relate back to the date the judgment is filed if— (A) the notice of renewal is filed before the expiration of the 20-year period to prevent the expiration of the lien; and (B) the court approves the renewal of such lien under this paragraph.   However, to me that Statute applies for a regular, district court judgment, not a dischargeability judgment.

Read more…