Update on Jim King

Update on Jim King.  Mari sent me a text yesterday morning that Jim went into surgery at 6:30 am and they expect it to last 3-4 hours.  I had called Jim the day before.  He sounded good and very upbeat.  It was not a heartattack, he said, – just some pesky veins that were 100% blocked, some carryover from his heart attack 20 years ago.  Mari asked me to “put out the word.”  She said, “Live from Kaiser in Hollywood.”   Yesterday afternoon, I received word that the surgery went well and Jim was resting comfortably.

Get well Jim, we need you back.

Flores to be Reheard En Banc by the Ninth Circuit

The 9th Circuit has vacated the Flores ruling by a three judge panel and ordered the case to be reheard en banc.   Flores is the case that ruled that an above median debtor with negative income per the means test does not have to have a five year plan.  It followed its prior ruling in Kagenveama and said that the Supreme Court in Lanning v. Hamilton did not reverse that portion of the Kagenveama ruling.   Go get ’em Nancy Clark.  I’ll be there.  Here is the order.   When I will post the briefing schedule and hearing date when I get them.

National Forms Subcommittee Proposing a National Chp. 13 Plan

To my fellow Ch13 Brethern!

Please take note that there is a National Forms Subcommittee, called the “Working Group” headed by retired Judge Eugene Wedoff (retired Bankruptcy Judge from Chicago & one of the 3 authors of the Means Test) that is proposing the creation of a NATIONAL CHAPTER 13 PLAN. It is an effort to make the plan easier to understand and to combine Motions to Value & Motions to Avoid Liens through the plan in one document. Please review the draft as it will significantly affect our practice — both for creditors and debtors.

Our Judge Saltzman has been requested to participate in this endeavor and will be attending a meeting in mid-January. It would behoove you to provide comments in this endeavor.

KEITH

THE LAW OFFICES OF KEITH ALAN HIGGINBOTHAM

Bankruptcy Court Implements Call Center

The Court has implemented a Call Center to provide information to the public.  The toll free number is (855) 460-9641.

Additional information is available here – http://go.usa.gov/gd9F

New Security Rules at Roybal

Non-employees have to enter the Roybal building at the Temple entrance.  Only employees can get through at the other end.  Also, they now want your coat to go through the machine as well as your belt and shoes.  Very exasperating.

Confirming Chapter 13 Plans – December 20, 2012 – 12 PM

Dear All:

On Thursday, December 20th at 12 noon at the office of the San Fernando Valley Bar Association, a distinguished panel of attorneys will present a one hour presentation on confirming chapter 13 plans. The panel includes debtor and creditor counsel as well as one staff attorney from the Office of Elizabeth Rojas, Chapter 13 Trustee. The program should be lively with feedback from attending attorneys.

The program is important for those bankruptcy attorneys who do not practice often (or not at all) in chapter 13 because you must be able to give good advice to your clients when discussing the chapter 13 option with them. For attorneys who do practice in chapter 13, what better opportunity to learn gems about confirmation issues than this program?

Here are the particulars about the program:

Confirming Chapter 13 Plans
Melissa Besecker, R. Grace Rodriguez, Lee Raphael and Patricia Said
San Fernando Valley Bar Association 5567 Reseda Bl., Ste 200, Tarzana, CA

Read more…

Chapter 13 Debtor has Absolute Right to Convert to Chapter 7

Taylor v. Danielson (In re Taylor),Case No. 5:11-cv-01879-GHK (USDC C.D. Cal, April 2012)

Issue:              Is there an absolute right to convert a case filed under Chapter 13 to Chapter 7?

Holding:         Yes, 11 U.S.C § 1307 provides an absolute right to convert a case filed under Chapter 13 to Chapter 7.

Judge George H. King

Debtors filed Chapter 13 on May 11, 2011.  During the life of the Chapter 13 case, the Court pointed out issues of plan feasibility.  The Court continued the Plan Confirmation Hearing to October 5, 2011.  On October 4, 2011, the debtors filed their Notice of Conversion of Bankruptcy Case from Chapter 13 to Chapter 7 (“Notice of Conversion”).  Despite their Notice of Conversion, the Bankruptcy Court dismissed the debtors’ case for failure to make payments and failure to file secured debt payment declarations.

The debtors appealed to the District Court raising the issue of whether section 1307 provides an absolute right to convert a case filed under Chapter 13 to Chapter 7.  The debtors argued that under section 1307 the Debtors have an absolute  right to convert their case from Chapter 13 to Chapter 7; and that the date of filing of the Notice of Conversion becomes the date of the conversion order.

The District Court reversed.  The Court of Appeals held that a debtor’s right to convert  under section 1307 is absolute, as there is no danger of the debtor escaping the consequences of bad faith conduct or for abuse of process.

The 9th Circuit has long held the right to convert from Chapter 13 to Chapter 7 is absolute.  The Court distinguished  In re Marrama, 549 U.S. 365 (2007) which held that conversion from Chapter 7 to Chapter 13 is not an absolute right, and can be forfeited for cause, which includes bad faith; and In re Rosson, 545 F. 3d 764 (9th Cir. 2008) which held there is no absolute right to dismissal of a Chapter 13 case.  The scenarios in Marrama (conversion from Chapter 7 to Chpater 13) and Rosson (dismissal of Chapter 13) are different from the case at hand, as the Court maintains jurisdiction over the debtor and the debtor cannot escape the consequences of bad faith conduct or abuse of process when the debtor’s case is converted from Chapter 13 to Chapter 7.  Instead, the Court agreed with the decision in In re DeFrantz, 454 B.R. 108 (9th Cir. BAP 2011) which held there is an absolute right to conversion from Chapter 13 to Chapter 7.

Finally, the Court held the absolute right is in conformity with Bankruptcy Rule 1307(a) which highlights the difference between conversion from Chapter 7 to Chapter 13 and vice versa, stating that a “Chapter 13 case shall be converted without court order when the debtor files a notice of conversion…” § 1307(a).

By Carolyn M. Afari, Esq.

Systems Unavailability – Friday, December 14, 2012 through Saturday, December 15, 2012

To:      ECF Users
Re:      Systems Unavailability
Friday, December 14, 2012 through Saturday, December 15, 2012

GSA will be performing emergency maintenance on the court’s systems.  As a result, the following systems will not be available starting Friday, December 14, 2012, at 7:00 p.m. through Saturday, December 15, 2012 at approximately 6:00 p.m.:

CM/ECF (both Live and Training)
LOU
McVCIS (previously VCIS – Voice Case Information System)

Please note that during this time you may access PACER for the purpose of querying CM/ECF.  We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

Best regards,
ECF Support
(213) 894-2365

Local Filings Down Again in November 2012

Bankruptcy filings in the Central District in November fell 21% over last year and 15% compared to last month.

Central District of California
2008 2009 2010 % 2011 2012
Jan 3,694 6,004 9,013 50% 10,868 21% 8,835 -19%
Feb 3,787 6,971 9,659 39% 10,631 10% 9,307 -12%
March 4,381 8,529 12,840 51% 13,543 5% 10,108 -25%
April 5,023 8,512 12,114 42% 12,087 0% 9,034 -25%
May 5,177 8,967 11,906 33% 11,669 -2% 9,620 -18%
June 5,351 9,595 12,190 27% 11,718 -4% 8,165 -30%
July 5,983 9,894 12,737 29% 10,418 -18% 8,201 -21%
Aug 6,195 9,748 12,720 30% 11,496 -10% 8,779 -24%
Sept 6,290 9,214 12,412 35% 10,006 -19% 7,222 -28%
Oct 6,364 10,322 11,753 14% 9,887 -16% 8,438 -15%
Nov 6,029 9,462 10,900 15% 9,099 -17% 7,192 -21%
Dec 6,615 9,864 10,925 11% 9,089 -17%
64,889 107,082 139,169 30% 130,511 -6%
% of total 0.059 0.075 0.089 0.095 0.852

 

cdcbaa — First Meeting of the Year 1/26/13

Out first program of the year will be the annual 9th Circuit Review on Saturday Jan 26. I will be joined by Judge Meredith Jury and Judge Neil Bason. Put it on your calendar.  Last year we had 146 attendees and ran out of handouts early. I will bring more this year but we expect a good crowd.

I am working on the materials. I would like to add some briefs on local judge’s rulings on attorneys fees. If you have a case or know of a case where a judge wrote an opinion or at least a memorandum or other written ruling on why or why not he or she allowed or disallowed fees, let me know the case number and I will look at it to include in the materials.

For that matter, any opinion or memorandum written by a local judge about an interesting issue should be brought to my attention.

Thanks.

-Jon Hayes