All posts in Community

RDM’s Roundup

The Earle Hagen Memorial Golf, Tennis and Poker Tournament committee is thrilled to announce that the proceeds of the 7th annual tournament of $28,987.11 were donated to Public Counsel’s Debtor Assistance Project this year.  The tourney has now generated over $200,000 for Public Counsel in its seven year history.

As most if not all of you know by now, the bankruptcy community lost Jim King in February.  The tourney was his baby and we are proud to have honored his leadership in organizing the event for so many years, and his extraordinary pro bono contributions throughout his legal career. Read more…

Legal Writing Tip: Its v. It’s

Although not bankruptcy related, it is useful in my opinion to keep in mind when to use Its versus It’s. Read more…

Random Thoughts for the Week

We have been discussing the usefulness of evidentiary objections in our office.  Judge Donovan commented at a cdcbaa meeting once that if there are no evidentiary objections, the evidence, almost whatever it is, is “in,” especially hearsay.  We should not depend on the judge to unilaterally ignore evidence that is not properly before the court.  Even though the evidence is read  and understood either way, the judge will have to overrule the objection or rule on something that is not properly supported.  Although we don’t do evidentiary objections as often as we should, I think they are important. Read more…

Random Thoughts for the Week

The bar exam results came out on Friday.  The headlines say that the success rate is the lowest ever.  One article is here.  My students’ view is “They’re making it harder and harder.”  They don’t believe me when I say I don’t think that is true.  Success is a function of effort.   You can’t learn law with one eye on your cell phone.  We had a study session Saturday at the law school.  I volunteered to meet with students and answer questions.  Out of 62 students, 6-7 showed up. Read more…

Word: Tautological

As I read BAP cases, I have to look up some interesting word choices.  I will try to put one up a week.

Word is: TAUTOLOGICAL.

Judge Markell, said “Although it is tautological that liens securing payment obligations can be satisfied by paying the money owed, it does not necessarily follow that such liens can be satisfied by paying any sum, however large or small.”   In re PW, LLC (Clear Channel Outdoor).

Tautological, in rhetoric, is a method of argument where the person simply repeats the same arguments using different phrases or words while trying to cover up the lack of evidence or valid reasoning supporting the conclusion. Read more…

ORANGE COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION COMMERCIAL LAW & BANKRUPTCY and BANKING & LENDING SECTIONS JOINT MEETING – November

ORANGE COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION
COMMERCIAL LAW & BANKRUPTCY and
BANKING & LENDING SECTIONS
JOINT MEETING – November

*TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 2015* 12:00 p.m. to 1:30 p.m.
(*Changed from previous meeting date of Thursday, 11-19-15*) Read more…

Random Thoughts for the Week

I’m starting to believe that business is actually slowing down.   Gives me time to catch up on the fee apps and ding all the clients who have forgotten to pay us.

In our office, we have gone back to using the old time chapter 11 Disclosure Statement pleading that everyone used for about 20 years until someone came up with the brainstorm of preprinted forms.  The forms are too hard to follow, especially when there are 3 or 4 different “approved” versions and different judges have different views of each.  I believe Roksana and Judge Zurzolo and his staff, i.e., Jeff Cozad, have been working on a new one.  My old boss used to say, “Right idea, wrong execution.”  I don’t mind trying the forms again but for now, the old pleading worked just fine. Read more…

RDM’s Roundup

The first thing I do when I wake up is read my ECF digest email to see what was filed in our cases during the previous twenty-four hours. This is both good and bad. If nothing ugly was filed, I jump out of bed. If an opposition or motion for relief was filed, I take my time. There is nothing more frustrating than receiving an opposition to a motion I have slaved over which either completely misstates the relief I am seeking (Hello, senior lienholder! I know it is debtor’s principal residence – I am obviously filing the valuation motion to ultimately deal with a fully unsecured junior lien in the plan!), or calls my client a scum bag (filing bankruptcy to stop a foreclosure sale is not, by itself, bad faith!).

It is easy to get insulted by oppositions – sometimes it feels personal – like the statements made are directed at moi, not my client. I often find that if I read an opposition, then let it sit for a day or two, then read it again that the words I initially understood to mean “go jump off a cliff” now read more along the lines of “bungee jump off a cliff.” However, this is not always true – most of us know attorneys who file scathing pleadings but are super easy to deal with in person. That stuff confuses me – reminds me of internet trolls. It is easy to be a jerk behind the computer screen but much harder to be that direct and insulting in person.

On another note, please take notice that Chapter 7 Trustee John Menchaca has announced that if you are not in the examination room at roll call your case will be continued. Lateness is not excused.

I always explain to clients that the Bankruptcy Schedules and Statements are meant to paint a complete picture of their current and past financial history. To that end, I am pretty excited about the new national forms. It will take some adjusting to an eight page petition, Schedules A and B being combined, etc., but the new forms are just so much more helpful – disclose, disclose, disclose!

-rdm

Random Thoughts for the Week

My partner Matt Resnik is meeting with a possible new client.  He was doing a loan mod with another atty who told him to file a pro per chapter 7 case to stop the foreclosure sale set for the next day.  When he did, Wells Fargo Bank immediately froze the $50,000 in this debtor’s bank account.  Presumably it has already been sent to the trustee.

I was just looking at a Judge Vicki Kaufman tentative ruling on a 12(b)(6) motion.  Plaintiff is saying – in the complaint – “my state court judgment is enough to show 523(a)(4) and (a)(6).”  Reminds me of a comment Judge Jury made to me at a mediation a week or two ago.  She said, “Good luck using the state court judgment or even findings to establish (a)(4) or (6).”  Judge Kaufman said the same.  Plead the express trust and the  “culpable state of mind requirement.”  As to (a)(6), plead  “that the debtor had a subjective motive to inflict the injury or that the debtor believed that injury was substantially certain to occur as a result of his conduct.” Read more…

RDM’s Roundup

I am starting a weekly blog post with interesting tidbits from around the Central District.  Hayes suggested that I call it “Notes and Comments.”  I like alliteration so I came up with “RDM’s Reflections, Recommendations, Reports (Rumors…)” — but that is probably over-the-top (which I am usually not opposed to!).  I think “RDM’s Roundup” works for now, but I am open to comments.

1) I enter into a least one stipulation per week, for various things like hearing continuances, Chapter 11 plan treatment agreements, etc.  I am surprised at how often opposing counsel shoots me an email stating “the stip looks fine, use my electronic signature.”  Huh?!  How can anyone, and especially the Court staff, be certain that the non-filing party really entered into the agreement?  The clerk will always reject an order on a stipulation that does not include the “wet” signature of the non-filing party.

2) Judge Klein has changed the hearing time for her Chapter 13 calendar on Thursday, December 3rd.  Instead of 10:00 and 11:00 a.m., all matters will be heard at 2:00 p.m. Read more…