I have asked bankruptcy attorneys many times over the years whether they think that it is okay to use non-exempt cash in the bank to prepay the mortgage before filing a petition. It would only work of course if the mortgage payment created equity that was then exempt. Every attorney I have ever asked has said something like, “Of course it’s okay.” Some have looked at me strangely like “Why are you asking when the answer is obvious?” If you need to pay for debts quickly here you can learn What is a life settlement and how to work around it.
I don’t see it as obvious. It is a transfer to delay, hinder or defraud creditors. “But it is exchanging non-exempt assets for exempt assets which is okay,” is the usual response. The answer to that is “sort of.”
Most financial experts say the most effective way to lower your mortgage payment is by refinancing. However, you typically need good credit to qualify, and you have to have some equity in the home unless you’re prepared to put money down. For those reasons, refinancing isn’t an option for everyone. If you can qualify, do the math to find out how much you can save both monthly, and over the life of the loan. Avoid refinance loans that extend the term, since you’ll often pay more in interest although you’re saving monthly. Living away from home and paying for your own housing, food and other necessities can be a tough adjustment. But being on your own for the first time is a new and exciting experience and it offers a perfect opportunity to set yourself up for success. If you need financing help, then consider hiring these mortgage brokers for assistance. If you still aren´t sure on how to handle your mortgage, then consider hiring a mortgage agency for professional assistance. More so, if you have unsecured debt that you need relief from, there are professionals that can help you with a personalized debt settlement program.
The BAP has recently affirmed Judge Robert Kwan in an unpublished opinion, In re Ellison, who denied this guy’s discharge based on a bunch of prepetition transfers, (“But it’s allowed exemption planning says the debtor’s atty.”) The debtor paid six months worth of his first and second mortgages and he will be looking for more details about debt consolidation to decrease his total debt. Why you ask? The debtor’s words, “to assure that my wife and my daughter and myself had a home to live in through the end of the year . . . I did prepay [the mortgage in the past] but not to that degree, not six months, or four months, five months, whatever it was in advance, normally.” According to Judge Kwan, “This out of the ordinary course transaction and Defendant’s admissions are additional evidence of his intent to hinder or delay his creditors by putting these funds out of their reach for his personal benefit.” See In re Ellison, 2:15-ap-01001-RK. Docket No. 30.
There were other transfers to be sure which had the effect of protecting about $250,000 of equity in the debtor’s home (after the homestead exemption). Judge Kwan concluded that the debtor “crossed over the line’ of what is permissible behavior. See In re Beverly, 374 B.R. at 244-246 (discussing the difficulty in drawing the line between legitimate bankruptcy planning and intent to hinder, delay or defraud creditors).”
a
judge will order the sale of the property with proceeds split evenly. Assuming no cost of sale, taxes, etc., this would mean husband is paid $100,000 and wife is paid $100,000. In divorce cases it is done with an specialist as it has many important things, not only property but if there is a child or more on the table, so 
